Loading game details, prices and reviews...

Virtual Robots - Robot programming simulator

Cold-Dark Software™ / Nov 1, 2017 / Indie, Simulation, Strategy

windows

0 playing now

Virtual Robots is a robot programming simulator. The objective of this game is to write code for your robots. Yes, WRITE.

Can your PC run it?

Change your PC

Part	Your PC	MinimumNot sure	RecommendedNot sure
CPU	Not set	2 GHz, Dual Core Can't tell	3.4 GHz, Quad Core Can't tell
GPU	Not set	AMD Radeon HD 5000 Series, GeForce 840M Can't tell	AMD Radeon HD 7700, GeForce GTX 650 Ti Can't tell
RAM	Not set	4 GB RAM Can't tell	4 GB RAM Can't tell

What's new

Bugfixes

2017-11-06

Fixed bugs with wrong end conditions in some levels. If you notice any bugs, please report them in general discussion. I will try to fix them as soon as possible.

Open on Steam

What players say

6 user reviews

0% positive, 6 reviews

Not recommended1 hrs played

Nice concept for a game, but without any serious documentation for the scripting language and the commands the robots understand, it is quite useless

19 found this helpful, 2018-03-18

Not recommended1 hrs played

Looking forward to c++ class next semester, was hoping this would be a good addition, I'll keep trying. However it's not C++ but a simular script pyros, The examples are kinda complicated.. tutorial seems composed of "ready this preprogrammed script" watch robot do it's thing. Not very interactive, or teaching. Love the idea of robots, and code. TLDR: I wouldn't buy this unless already have a good understanding of...

10 found this helpful, 2018-06-09

Not recommended2 hrs played

No, not even if you're an experienced programmer. This game is no good for learning how to code since the code is difficult to figure out due to its similarity to java. It is not fun for people who know java because the game itself is a buggy mess and crashes randomly. The game doesn't save settings so every time you enter/exit a level the music starts playing again at default volume. Overall, this feels like you're...

6 found this helpful, 2021-12-18

Not recommended